Comparing team accelerated instruction and jigsaw in mathematics: Effects on students’ learning interest and computational thinking skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56587/bemi.v4i1.138Keywords:
Team Accelerated Instruction, Jigsaw, Learning Interest, Computational Thinking skillsAbstract
Background: Enhancing students’ learning interest and computational thinking skills has become a critical objective of 21st-century education. Nevertheless, conventional instructional approaches often fail to optimally develop these competencies, necessitating the implementation of more effective cooperative learning models.
Purpose: This study aims to compare the effects of the Team Accelerated Instruction (TAI) and Jigsaw learning models on students’ learning interest and computational thinking skills.
Method: This study employed a quasi-experimental design using a non-equivalent control group design involving 56 tenth-grade students. Data were collected through a learning interest questionnaire and a computational thinking skills test. The data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test with the assistance of SPSS version 25.
Findings: The findings revealed that the Team Accelerated Instruction (TAI) model was more effective than the Jigsaw model in enhancing both students’ learning interest and computational thinking skills. The mean rank of computational thinking skills in the TAI group was 16.71, compared to 11.46 in the Jigsaw group, with a statistically significant difference (p < .05). Similarly, the mean rank of learning interest was higher in the TAI group (21.21) than in the Jigsaw group (15.25), and the difference was also statistically significant (p < .05). These findings indicate that the TAI model is more effective than the Jigsaw model in improving students’ learning interest and computational thinking skills.
References
Alami, P., Bakti, I., & Syahmani, S. (2022). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Aktif Tipe Quiz Team Terhadap Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam. JCAE (Journal of Chemistry And Education), 5(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.20527/jcae.v5i1.1154
Arditya Prayogi, Irfandi, & M. Arif Kurniawan. (2024). Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif : Suatu Telaah. Complex : Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Nasional, 1(2), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.66341/complex.v1i2.7
Birahi, M., Wattimena, A. Z., Lewaherilla, N., & Latupeirissa, S. J. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (Ctl) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Uji Mann Whitney Dan Wald Wolfowits. PARAMETER: Jurnal Matematika, Statistika Dan Terapannya, 1(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.30598/parameterv1i1pp59-68
Cahyaningsih, U. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Tai (Team Assisted Individualization) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v4i1.707
Dağ, F., Şumuer, E., & Durdu, L. (2023). The effect of an unplugged coding course on primary school students’ improvement in their computational thinking skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(6), 1902–1918. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12850
Danis, A., & Ayu Lestari, K. (2024). Pengaruh Metode Eksperimen dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA pada Materi Tumbuhan Hijau. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(03), 991–998. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v4i03.4962
Dian Mariani. (2020). Aspek-Aspek Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala SurabayaKampus Kota Madiun, 2, 147–153.
Felisia Reformasi Daeli. (2024). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Learning Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Curve Elasticity: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 5(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.57094/jpe.v5i1.1577
Huang, S. Y., Tarng, W., & Ou, K. L. (2023). Effectiveness of AR Board Game on Computational Thinking and Programming Skills for Elementary School Students. Systems, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010025
I Made Ayada, & I Made Tegeh. (2024). Environmentally Based STAD Type Cooperative Learning Model Improves Mathematics Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 7(4), 722–729. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i4.60873
Jeppu, A. K., Kumar, K. A., & Sethi, A. (2023). ‘We work together as a group’: implications of jigsaw cooperative learning. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 734. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04734-y
Kurniawan, M. (2023). Digital English-mediated Instruction: Kajian Reflektif Implementasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Virtual bagi Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 7940–7952. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5496
Lee, H.-Y., Wu, T.-T., Lin, C.-J., Wang, W.-S., & Huang, Y.-M. (2024). Integrating Computational Thinking Into Scaffolding Learning: An Innovative Approach to Enhance Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Hands-On Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(2), 211–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231211916
Lehmann, T. H. (2023). Using algorithmic thinking to design algorithms: The case of critical path analysis. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 71, 101079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101079
Mendrofa, N. K. (2024). Computational Thinking Skills in 21st Century Mathematics Learning. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i1.3780
Nurhaswinda, Muslimah, N., Eka Yuliani, C., Amanda Putri, R., Mayura, V., Rahmadhansyah, A., Selvira, D., Nurrahman, H., Qadri, R., Bramantyo, D., & Rifaldi, A. (2026). Uji Normalitas Dan Homogenitas Dalam Analisis Statistik. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(01), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i01.11233
Putra, L. D., Arlinsyah, N. D., Ridho, F. R., Syafiqa, A. N., & Annisa, K. (2024). Pemanfaatan Wordwall pada Model Game Based Learning terhadap Digitalisasi Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 12(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v12i1.8749
Richardo, R., Dwiningrum, S. I. A., Murti, R. C., Wijaya, A., Adawiya, R., Ihwani, I. L., Ardiyaningrum, M., & Aryani, A. E. (2025). Computational thinking skills profile in solving mathematical problems based on computational thinking attitude. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(2), 1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21643
Sahrul, S. , M. R. Rochmawan. , Ardiana Vita Ratnasari., & Asteria Narulita Pramana. (2025). Inclusive Society Community Servies (ISCO) Pengolahan Data Kuantitatif Cepat dan Efektif. Journal Inclusive Society Community Servies, 62–69.
Saifuddin, A. (2021). Apakah Desain Eksperimen Satu Kelompok Layak Digunakan? Literasi : Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Multi-Perspektif, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22515/literasi.v1i1.3255
Sastramayani, S. (2020). Mempertemukan Semesta Guru dan Peserta Didik dalam Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Shautut Tarbiyah, 24(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.31332/str.v24i2.1174
Septi Anggraeni, N. D., & Octavia, B. (2023). The Effect of Encyclopedia and Discovery Learning to Improve Learning Motivation and Mastery of Concepts in Student. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 13(3), 1354–1365. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v13.i3.202334
Suhendar, A. M., Ali, S., & Suratman, A. (2021). Membangun Berpikir Kreatif, Sistematis Dan Logis Matematis Melalui Pembelajaran Koding. Jurnal Perspektif, 5(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v5i2.131
Tai, K. Y., Dhaliwal, J., & Balasubramaniam, V. (2022). Leveraging Mann–Whitney U test on large-scale genetic variation data for analysing malaria genetic markers. Malaria Journal, 21(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04104-x
Tinungki, G. M., Hartono, P. G., Nurwahyu, B., Islamiyati, A., Robiyanto, R., Hartono, A. B., & Raya, M. Y. (2024). Exploring the team-assisted individualization cooperative learning to enhance mathematical problem solving, communication and self-proficiency in teaching non-parametric statistics. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2381333
Wahyuni, N., Elpisah, & Hartini. (2025). The Impact of Jigsaw and Window-Shopping Cooperative Learning Models on Students’ Social Studies Achievement. International Journal of Contemporary Sciences (IJCS), 2(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijcs.v2i3.13553
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical. Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
Yulianti, Y. A., & Wulandari, D. (2021). Flipped Classroom : Model Pembelajaran untuk Mencapai Kecakapan Abad 21 Sesuai Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 372. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3209
Zhan, Z., Li, T., & Ye, Y. (2024). Effect of jigsaw‐integrated task‐driven learning on students’ motivation, computational thinking, collaborative skills, and programming performance in a high‐school programming course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22793
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Darmaji, Edy Widayat, Sucipto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
