Does the co-trainers learning model improve English proficiency? Evidence from vocational high school students across different study programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56587/bemi.v4i2.166Keywords:
Co-Trainers Learning Model, English Proficiency Test, Vocational Education, English for Vocational PurposesAbstract
Background: English proficiency has become an essential competency for vocational high school graduates to meet the communication demands of an increasingly globalized workforce. However, English instruction in vocational education is still predominantly delivered through General English approaches, which often fail to accommodate the diverse communication needs of different vocational study programs.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the Co-Trainers Learning Model by examining the English proficiency profile of vocational high school students, comparing English proficiency across different vocational study programs, and identifying the study programs demonstrating the highest English proficiency based on the English Proficiency Test (EPT).
Method: A quantitative study employing a posttest-only comparative design was conducted involving 888 students from six vocational high schools in Central Java, Indonesia. Participants had completed English learning through the Co-Trainers Learning Model before undertaking the English Proficiency Test (EPT). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test to identify significant differences among vocational study programs.
Findings: The findings revealed that students generally demonstrated a moderate level of English proficiency, with listening performance exceeding reading performance. Among the participants, 288 students were enrolled in health- and pharmacy-related study programs, while 600 students represented non-health vocational programs. Significant differences in English proficiency were identified across vocational study programs, with health-related programs consistently achieving higher proficiency than several other programs.
Implication: These findings suggest that the effectiveness of the Co-Trainers Learning Model is closely associated with the contextual characteristics and communication demands of individual vocational disciplines, supporting the integration of collaborative learning and English for Vocational Purposes to strengthen workplace-oriented English instruction in vocational education.
References
Ahmed, A. S. M. M., Jamshed, M., Sarfaraj, M., & Banu, S. (2024). Exploring Diverse Teaching Models for Enhancing Nursing Students’ English Language Proficiency: A Blended Learning Perspective. World Journal of English Language, 14(5), 182. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n5p182
Alvi, A. H. (2023). From Pedagogy to Andragogy in Post Covid-19 ESP Courses: A Customized Blended Learning Model for English in Medicine at a Saudi University. World Journal of English Language, 13(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n2p77
Anwas, E. O. M., Permatasari, A. D., Iftitah, K. N., Supriyatno, S., Salman, I., & Firdaus, W. (2025). Teacher’s Guidebook: Promising Solutions to the Challenges of Vocational and Language Learning in Vocational High Schools. International Journal of Language Education, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i4.70000
Bostley, M. A., & Peters, A. I. (2023). Scientific Research Sample Size Determination. The International Journal of Science & Technoledge. https://doi.org/10.24940/theijst/2023/v11/i7/st2307-008
Budiarto, M. K., Asrowi, Gunarhadi, Karsidi, R., & Rahman, A. (2024). E-Learning Platform for Enhancing 21st Century Skills for Vocational School Students: A Systematic Literature Review. In Electronic Journal of e-Learning (Vol. 22, Issue 5, pp. 76–90). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.5.3417
Chen, R. H. (2021). Fostering Students’ Workplace Communicative Competence and Collaborative Mindset through an Inquiry-Based Learning Design. Education Sciences, 11(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010017
Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., & Burke, D. (2024). AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2503–2529. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
Dafouz Milne, E. (2021). Crossing disciplinary boundaries: English-medium education (EME) meets English for Specific Purposes (ESP). Ibérica, 41, 13–38. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.41.13
Farmati, C., Yeou, M., & Benzahaf, B. (2023). Blended learning in English for specific purposes instruction: A systematic review. Digital Education Review, 44, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2023.44.114-124
Gaisford, S., & O’Neill, M. (2006). Quantitative Data Analysis. In Pharmaceutical Isothermal Calorimetry (pp. 117–188). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420004779-6
Haq, M., & Yasin, N. (2025). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methodology Paradigms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 6(6), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v6i6.144
Li, Z. (2022). The Construction of University English Translation Teaching Model Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7755508
Liu, D., Deng, Y., & Wimpenny, K. (2022). Students’ perceptions and experiences of translanguaging pedagogy in teaching English for academic purposes in China. Teaching in Higher Education, 29, 1234–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2129961
Macaro, E., & Aizawa, I. (2024). English medium instruction, EAP/ESP: Exploring overlap and divergences in research aims. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 1352–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12563
Mao, F., & Zhou, J. (2024). A needs analysis of ESP courses in colleges of art and design: Consensus and divergence. PLOS ONE, 19(6), e0305210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305210
Pfenninger, S. E., & Neuser, H. (2019). Inferential statistics in quantitative data analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 415–426). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471-35
Purwati, D., Ubaidillah, M. F., & Restall, G. C. (2023). “Sorry, I Can’t Speak”: English Teachers’ Challenges of Teaching EFL Speaking in an Indonesian Vocational High School Sector. Mextesol Journal, 47(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v47n1-1
Rahmanu, I. W. E. D., & Molnár, G. (2024). Multimodal immersion in English language learning in higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(19), e38357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38357
Ramalingam, S., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Blended Learning Strategies for Sustainable English as a Second Language Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(13), 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138051
Santi, D. O., & Endarto, I. T. (2024). Evaluating EFL textbooks for vocational high schools in Indonesia: A corpus-informed and lexile-based model. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(3), 1412–1430. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.34976
Setyowati, R. (2020). Improving English Communicative Competence at Tertiary Level of Education in Industrial Revolution 4.0 using Co-Trainers Program Ratini Setyowati. Makna: Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, Bahasa Dan Budaya, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.33558/makna.v6i1.2010
Setyowati, R., Oktaviani, I., Hastuti, I., Nurnaningsih, N., Paki, R., & Jerniati, J. (2025). Gauging the Interactive Language Learning to improve English Communication Skills Among Vocational High School Students. World Journal of English Language, 15(4), 251. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n4p251
Setyowati, R., Setiawati, B., & Rohmah Khurniawati, D. (2022). Study of English Communicative Competence At the Tertiary Level of Education Based on European Framework of Reference. FRASA: English Education and Literature Journal, 3(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.47701/frasa.v3i1.2030
Simanjuntak, M. B., Rafli, Z., & Utami, S. R. (2025). Elevating Vocational Student Competence: The Crucial Need for English Literacy Competence. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(1), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i1.1109
Strogilos, V., King-Sears, M. E., Tragoulia, E., Voulagka, A., & Stefanidis, A. (2023). A meta-synthesis of co-teaching students with and without disabilities. Educational Research Review, 38, 100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100504
Tegeh, I. M., Parmiti, D. P., Adijaya, M. A., & Suprianti, G. A. P. (2025). Metacognitive Based Learning Assisted by Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) to Improve Students’ Literacy and Communication Skills in English Language Learning. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1315
Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2023). Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second language on students’ academic reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1456–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820985236
Yildirim, K. N., & Bal, N. G. (2023). English Language Education in a Vocational School: A Qualitative Case Study. Participatory Educational Research, 10(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.40.10.2
Yu, J., & Abdullah, R. (2025). Motivating Left-Behind Vocational Students in English Learning through Game-Based Listening Activities: The Interaction between Self-Esteem and Listening Comprehension Skills. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.7509
Zhang, L., Mohammed, L. A., Mohammed, S. A., & Fauziah, D. (2025). Examing the impact of multimodal learning approaches on English language proficiency in higher vocational education in China. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(1), 2026003. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026003
Zheng, X. (2021). Statistical Analysis in Quantitative Research. In Research Methods for Student Radiographers (pp. 93–107). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367559311-7
Zhou, T., & Zhang, W. (2022). Effectiveness Study on Online or Blended Language Learning Based on Student Achievement: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. Sustainability, 14(12), 7303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127303
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ratini Setyowati, Intan Oktaviani, Indra Hastuti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
